From: To: Paul Cassell Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: Proposed Pleading to File - fixed a couple of sentences Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:50:55 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul, Thank you for sending the revised document. I have spoken with the Acting U.S. Attorney on this matter. We believe that if the victims simply filed a response to the order to show cause, and deferred filing any motion for summary judgment, it would promote the process for the parties to meet and address mutual concerns. However, we will not stipulate that the government has not been prejudiced by the passage of time in this case from its initial filing in July 2008. ----Original Message-- From: Paul Cassell [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 4:10 PM To: Paul Cassell; Cc: Brad Edwards; Subject: RE: Proposed Pleading to File - fixed a couple of sentences Dexter, I noticed that I missed a couple of sentences in the pleading I sent to you that made reference to the simultaneously filed declaration of Brad Edwards. This revision fixes those couple of sentences, making reference only to a soon-to-be filed declaration. Paul Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you. ----Original Message--- From: Paul Cassell Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 1:50 PM To: Cc: 'Brad Edwards': Subject: RE: Propos di gn o e THE FOLLOWING COMMUNICATION IS A SETTLEMENT OFFER WITHIN THE MEANING OF FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 408 Dear EFTA0020667