From: To:' Cc: ' (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" ctl [=. (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: government position? Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:02:06 +0000 Importance: Normal S Yes. I will respond to Cassell. Have a good trip. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda February 02, 2012 7:55 PM To: USAFLS Cc: . (USAFLS) Subject: FW: government position? I don't know why he keeps sending these to me or leaving you off the emails. Can you respond? I will be traveling and at the Bar's Professional Ethics Committee meeting in Orlando tomorrow. Thanks, • From: Paul ma ll [mallto Sent: Thursda Februa 02, 2012 7:43 PM To: (USAFLS); Brad Edwards Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: government position? Heys, Sorry to rush you, but following up on our email from a couple of days ago, Brad and I are hoping to file tomorrow (1) Our motion for order directing government to file redacted, unsealed pleadings in the public court file (all three of your sealed pleadings); and (2) A motion for the court to deny the motion to dismiss without requiring additional pleadings from us or, at a minimum, ti grant leave to file a sur-reply (we propose that our brief be of the same length as yours and due 4 weeks after the court rules on our motion (1) above). I know there may be a "clearance" process there on this case, but hoping you can give us a position by, say, noon Friday? Thanks in advance for your help. Paul Cassell Co-counsel for Jane Doe ttl and Jane Doe #2 EFTA00204877