From: Sent To: Cc: Subject 1 agree. Ask Jack to make that change. Original Mess From: To: Sent: Fri Jun 27 21:28:46 2008 Subject: Agreement Saturday, June 28, 2008 7:38 AM Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Re: Agreement tit Hadn't heard back, so I figured this would be easiest way to communicate. I got a call back from Jack Goldberger, incensed that I was somehow accusing him of trying to get out of the agreement. I was taken aback because the response was completely out of line with the questions I was asking. From my dealings with Jack, this just made me more suspicious than I was originally. Anyhow, Jack said that "this was the only way to do the consecutive jail time." And he "swore" that Epstein would be in custody 24- hours-a-day during the community confinement portion of the sentence. He also insisted that Epstein had been charged with a substantive procurement offense, not attempt. He did, however, let it slip that Epstein would not be at the jail, he would be at the stockade out on the fairgrounds (a low security "camp"). Since we specifically discussed this at the meeting with Batty Krisher months ago that Epstein would be at the Gun Club facility (the jail), this certainly violates the spirit of the agreement, if not the letter. I talked to who used to be with the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office before joining our office. Shc said, first, that it was extremely strange to call it the "Palm Beach County Detention Center," rather than the jail, but I explained that I thought Epstein's people were trying to make us believe he was going to the jail even though he wasn't and this was their way to "finesse" the situation. also explained that the normal way for the plea agreement to read is a consecutive term of six months imprisonment to be co owed by one year of community control — in other words, Goldberger's statement that this was the "only way" to do the consecutive sentence is false. I did find a statute that says that if two