From: To: Cc: Data a n, fl usekum (EXTERNAL EMAIL] - RE: Epstein Evidence status Friday, July 24, 2020 3:09:02 PM I don't have the evidence in front of me, but it is probably accurate. It is not unusual for the software to find such files. I will review Monday to make sure. As to your questions from last night, the sheet should be comprehensive. I only recall I addition, but I am sure that what I have is reflected in the sheet. As for the items in dark grey, there are 2 servers with multiple drives. Some of those drives have physically failed. We have to get them to one of our HQ specialists for recovery. Since they are physically broken, data recovery may or may not be possible. It can be a very long process. We will get that moving ASAP. Need anything else, let me know. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk (USANYS)" wrote: In addition to the pending questions below, we've been advised by the vendor that is reviewing the initial seven devices (that were provided on a per-device extraction basis, as previously discussed) that those materials include approximately 71,000 documents that are zero bytes (i.e., empty files). They are listed in the attached spreadsheet. Is that accurate? Or does that reflect some issue with the extraction process? thanks, From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 18:08 To: MI, I. (NY) (FBI) Cc: (NY) (FBI) I. (NY) (FBI) (usArtes)fl>; (USANYS) (USANYS) [Contractor] < > Subject: RE: Epstein Evidence status This is very helpful, thank you. Comparing this to the prior spreadsheet, and leaving aside the "Nothing for Southern" designations as well as the NYC numbers that look like they're for the 3503-058 Page 1 of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002204 EFTA00157380