From: (USANYS)" To: (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Discovery review project Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 20:33:41 +0000 Yes sure From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:33 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project That works for me. Should we send to chiefs for their review? From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:31 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project So the number we are producing is reflected through the bates range, I think. On the anonymized list, why don't we just say a list of custodians is available if requested? From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:26 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project This looks fine with two suggestions: - Do we want to mention the number of items we are producing? - Do we want to provide an anonymized list of the individuals whose email accounts we have? From: (USANYS) < Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 3:56 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Discovery review project Here's a revised letter with the discussion of the email searches in a footnote. Let me know what you think and then we can copy it over to the other one. From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 1:10 PM To: (USANYS) < > Subject: FW: Discovery review project Would you be able to review and add the language about the email searches? From: (USANYS) [Contractor] < Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 1:08 PM EFTA00101144