From: ' „cl To: " CIA/sri=1.>, " (USANYS)" Cc: ' Subject: RE: GM -- search warrant returns Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:58:13 +0000 Attachments: 2020-06-26,_search_wan-ant,_20_mag_6719.pdf (USANYS)" Sure, the warrant is attached. From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 3:52 PM To: ); (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: GM -- search warrant returns Thanks Let's see what says about the attachments. Do you mind sending the rider for the warrant that we would be seizing these materials pursuant to? From: Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 2:12 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: GM -- search warrant returns Update from There are 128,175 email attachments attached to emails with search term hits that are empty files. review of the emails to which these empty files attached suggests that the FBI only provided us with partial files for these emails. Unclear whether those partial files are all that the FBI was able to extract from the devices, or whether the FBI left out parts of these files when producing them to us. I have asked Flatley for a call tomorrow morning to discuss. In the meantime, that still leaves us with a very large number of documents hitting on the search terms. Here is a breakdown of the file types: • 1,087,903 are emails (majority featuring Epstein as sender or recipient) • 323,179 are email attachments (128,175 of which are empty files as discussed above) • The remaining 36,619 are a mix of non-email files with no association with emails, such as Word, PDF, PowerPoint, and Excel files. (USANYS) (USANYS) From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 8:26 AM To: ) < Cc: Subject: RE: GM -- search warrant returns I tend to agree that if we really do have hundreds of thousands of emails between Epstein and Groff talking about the logistics of travel or meetings with women, we have a good faith basis to tag those as responsive. To the extent defense counsel (or we) want(s) to run search terms within those