From: To:' Cc: " Subject: Re: USVI AG Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 14:54:28 +0000 Can you remind us - as part of your communications in October did you ask her who at USVI AG was supervising this, and did you get an answer? Particularly if not, and while we're certainly happy to get involved, I might suggest you start by reaching out again to (1) confirm that USVI has been issuing subpoenas (and obviously try to gather any intel we can), and (2) express our concern about that at the line level. In the same call, assuming (as we do) that it doesn't result in them immediately agreeing to stand down, I would tell her you plan to elevate and ask her (again?) who the appropriate supervisor is at USVI AG. It will then be well teed up for to reach out later this week or next. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 1, 2020, at 6:05 PM ) wrote: Hi Following up on this, we spoke with counsel to the USVI in October and raised these concerns. The attorney said she would consult with the USVI AG and get back to us. She did not get back to us, and we've learned today that the USVI has been issuing a number of subpoenas to individuals—including to—• It seems clear to us they're not willing to work with us at the line level on this issue. Would it be possible to elevate this? Thanks, From: Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 4:21 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: USVI AG Okay, sounds good. And that's great. Makes it somewhat easier for us to tell USVI AG, if we get there, that we are prepared to intervene to seek a stay if we have to. From: Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 4:19 PM To: M :'; Cc: >: Subject: RE: USVI AG Thanks — we can reach out at the line level for a call and let you know how it goes. need to be elevated, but we're happy to start there. Judge Freeman granted our motion for a stay, which is good. From: Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 2:19 PM To: Cc: and I agree this will likely > Subject: RE: USVI AG EFTA00093467