From: ' ci To: a" " ir>, ) (USANYS)" Cc: ' (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Epstein Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:46:28 +0000 I spoke with S who is interested in attending the meeting. She asked who she should be in touch with to get more information about logistics. Who would be the best point of contact for our agent? Or if there's someone you'd prefer to put in contact with Sean, that works too. Thanks, From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 12:42 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Epstein Great. Thanks very much, From: sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 11:55 AM To: (USANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Epstein Thanks for explaining — to be clear, we don't have any objection to providing a broader list, I just wanted to make sure that's what they were asking for to avoid any confusion. We have definitely identified additional victims since August 2019, and FBI victim services will have that information, so I think it makes sense for FBI to provide that information in the first instance, as they'll have the most updated contact information. I'll ask our case agents for the updated list so that I can spot check it for accuracy before FBI shares it. From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 11:45 AM To: I *c *; (USANYS)< > Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Epstein >; Thanks, . This is actually ODAG, not OPR, but ODAG is asking if we are aware of additional victims who aren't on the list I sent yesterday. Like us, they are taking an extremely broad view and will not distinguish between people who are statutory victims of and people who self-describe as victims for any other reason in extending invitations. ODAG seems to think the list I sent around yesterday was our list of invites for the nolle proceeding, which I would have thought included everyone we and FBI had identified as of August 2019. Is that not the case? In any event, I did suggest EFTA00091442