From: < >, (USANYS)" 1 ( l.> To: III y. Cc: I (USANYS)" <I I> Subject: RE: Epstein Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:41:51 +0000 (USANYS)" < Great. Thanks very much, From: Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 11:55 AM To: (USANYS) c: 1> (USANYS) > Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Epstein Thanks for explaining — to be clear, we don't have any objection to providing a broader list, I just wanted to make sure that's what they were asking for to avoid any confusion. We have definitely identified additional victims since August 2019, and FBI victim services will have that information, so I think it makes sense for FBI to provide that information in the first instance, as they'll have the most updated contact information. I'll ask our case agents for the updated list so that I can spot check it for accuracy before FBI shares it. From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 11:45 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Epstein Thanks, . This is actually ODAG, not OPR, but ODAG is asking if we are aware of additional victims who aren't on the list I sent yesterday. Like us, they are taking an extremely broad view and will not distinguish between people who are statutory victims of Epstein's and people who self-describe as victims for any other reason in extending invitations. ODAG seems to think the list I sent around yesterday was our list of invites for the nolle proceeding, which I would have thought included everyone we and FBI had identified as of August 2019. Is that not the case? In any event, I did suggest ODAG reach out to FBI victim services and provided them with the contact information for the key person at the FBI along with and I am happy to reiterate that suggestion. But if we know of victims who aren't on that list, they were asking for our help in adding them. From: Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 11:38 AM To: (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein (USANYS) On the first question, we're to review the list