From: To: Subject: RE: Epstein status Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 14:45:09 +0000 All sounds good and makes sense, and thanks as always. From Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 09:53 To: Subject: RE: Epstein status Thanks his is perfect, no need to discuss. We're on the same page, I'll follow up with-and -on the mail cover. We've been in touch with the FBI office that handles Manchester by the Sea on numerous occasions. We are all in agreement that due to the exclusiveness of the property a surveillance wouldn't be productive and we don't want to get too aggressive and potentially tip them off. The FBI office up there is reluctant to approach the local PD with inquiries for fear it would leak to Maxwell and might encourage her to take off. Let's keep in touch, talk to you soon. From. Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2020 1:06 PM To Subject: RE: Epstein status We're going through the same periodic firedrill too. In terms of general news to report, we've put in a memo recommending charging Maxwell, but now there are a bunch of different views about what exactly the charges should be, so we're doing a bunch of additional memos to address those questions. But on the actual investigative side, really the only questions we've been getting are likely the same ones you have been, over the ast few days. We're going to re-up subpoenas on Amazon, and they've also asked us to convey a request tan get a mail cover, which we just did yesterday so that's very recent. And we're also going pack up on a pen for Maxwell's phone number. In terms of timeline, I honestly have no idea — I think in theory it's possible that if grand juries come back for June or July they could want to do an arrest of Maxwell then, but because the decisions in my office on this case are made so far above the line assistants' heads, I'm not sure. Personally, I think Maxwell is a flight risk so I'd like to get her detained at least until we have a handle on her passports and finances, and no judge is p