From: ".=, To: ' (USANYS) [Contractor]" < Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor]" < Subject: RE: materials Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:49:28 +0000 Attachments: 2021.11.18_Maxwell Discovety_Lettendocx SANYS Sorry for the delay on prepping these materials for production—I noticed one discrepancy (one empty folder) that I asked the agents to check on, and they did confirm that it was empty originally rather than due to any sort of error. These roduction is saved here for our review: And the draft cover letter is attached (saved Because there are several deposition video clips that we could not find as having been produced the production is around 13GB, we will need a hard drive from defense counsel. While we haven't produced these clips, the transcript for this deposition was produced in April as 3500, specifically 3501.183-020. We should request a hard drive of at least 32GB from defense counsel (we still have two hard drives for Maxwell, both of which are sufficiently large to accommodate the production). Let me know what you think or if you have any questions. From: Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 5:03 PM To: (USANYS) [Contractor] < (USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: (USANYS) [Contractor] < > materials < M> Ah, okay. Rule 16, please. Thanks! From: (USANYS) [Contractor] Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 4:25 PM To: <= >; (USANYS)O -I< ; Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] < Subject: RE: materials No. All of the files at the link below were not produced in 3500, though it seems like some of the longer ones may have been produced in Rule 16 (a few hundred page dots that appear to be subpoena returns that we have not checked every page of which, for example, some of the dots- Since they have either not been produced or not entirely confirmed as having been produced, I was wondering whether these documents at the link below should be produced as 3500 or Rule 16? From: I Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 4:21 PM To: (USANYS) [Contractor] c (USANYS) EFTA0