From: ' To: Laura Menninger <[email protected]>, ' )" , USANYS)" Cc: Jeff Pagliuca <[email protected]>, mceverdellgcohengressencomm e-ceverdellgcohengressencom>, "'Bobbi Sternheim (bcsternheimgmac.com)'" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - [conferral re photo and other discovery deficiencies) Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 00:21:35 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png Laura, I will pass this on to the FBI and our vendor for review. Once I have consulted with them, I will revert back to you on this issue. Thank you, From: Laura Menninger <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 20213:28 PM To: mc==.>: I ‹ > (USANYS) Cc: Jeff Pagliuca <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; 'Bobbi Sternheim ([email protected])' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - [conferral re photo and other discovery deficiencies] Thank you for your explanation. I also have gone back to our IT department and, unfortunately, your FBI/vendor explanation is insufficient. • Based on our review, which has been double-checked, there are hash values in the overlay that don't match the index and visa- versa. • The snips below show an example of an entry from the overlay file you provided (with file names and MD5 Hash) which did not join to the non-nude index. We were able to find the corresponding file in the index using the file name, which in this particular instance was unique. As you can see, the MD5 hashes don't match. From the overlay file ProdBeg8ates File Name MD5 Hash SDNY_GM_C0503260 Jeffrey VF2.psd DA92DF87819FCCI3F38E05841)8077DFB SDNY GM 00506551 LSJ librarywindow150dpilif 58ACKBE826.591AEFD0604ABA226272D From non-nude index File Name irgl LSJ librarywIndow150dpUlf SHA-1 MD5 043670EDF17D35EE5794EBDF094AEF63A95D489A BDE866247E99D1C9EED28A30F88F72D5 More importantly, if as you report you did not deduplicate the production and if the index you produced is accurate,