From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: US v. Epstein Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 18:22:23 +0000 Got it, thanks. From: Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 09:19 To: Cc: ) ) < (USANYS) < Subject: RE: US v. Epstein Good Morning, Here are the answers to your questions: 1. I checked my previous e-mail to you to see what was on the first set of data to confirm that the data was listed twice as it was on the hard drive I sent out this week. You will not see two copies of the same document in the database as we will globally dedupe the data. You may want to ask the FBI if this was an updated version from the first delivery. I did not highlight NYCO24366 as I missed it in the spread sheet. 2. Anything that is supplemental will just be added to the database. There should be no issue with those documents. 3. I checked the list before I sent it to you so I did not see it on the list. You should have received the hard drive and you should be able to plug the drive into your computer to check to see if you see the NYC number on the drive. Please let us know if there are any questions. Thank you. From: Sent: Thursda Jul 30 2020 6:49 PM To: Cc: • Subject: RE: US v. Epstein I think we're just trying to line up what has been sent to PAE *in total* -- including both this recent drive and also the previous one. So, a few questions, that I'll try to keep as non-confusing as possible. 1) I take it from your email below that three items were listed as having been provided on 7/23, but there are three that were in the first set of data you received and send out last week (NYCO24328, NYCO24366, and NYCO24392). My question on these is, were they actually *also* included in this recent disc, or was that incorrect on the spreadsheet? The reason I ask is, if they were provided twice, I just want to make sure the FBI didn't provide an updated version, such that we'd need to supplement or replace what we previously sent out. EFTA00084527