From: Michael Bachne To: 'SI Cc: r> Subject: Re: =Attorney Proffer Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 22:31:22 +0000 Inline-Images: image00 1 jpg in DC on biz. Get back to u soon Michael Bachner Bachner & Weiner, PC Please excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation. https://www.actl.com/ NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice. On Mar 3, 2020, at 6:15 PM, Michael, ) > wrote: Wanted to get back to you, as promised - as we indicated previously, the attorney proffers we've received from you haven't caused us to change our view of Ms. status, and I think you've generally addressed the initial and follow- up questions we've had. I think from our perspective the next step would be to have a conversation with Ms.= directly, and to cover with her the same topics that we've addressed with you. Ordinarily we would approach a discussion like that simply by going chronologically, and asking follow-up questions as appropriate along the way, but as I've mentioned to you previously, if it would be useful to proceed in a different format, or to focus (or avoid) specific topics in a first meeting, I think we would generally be amenable to that. And of course as we've also discussed, any discussion would be completely voluntary—not just the interview overall, but any specific topic or question that she wanted to pass on, or discuss with you in the moment, etc., w