From: ' )" To: ' airBI)" <1 Cc: "I ( Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 21:10:29 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019-02-19, JE,_Hammad_memo_spreadsheet.xlsx USANYS)" Following up on the below, I have good news — our Hammad memo has been approved by the Deputy U.S. Attorney, which is the final go-ahead we needed. We have permission to approach any of the individuals we've identified so far in the case as being a witness, victim, and/or subject. For any individuals represented by counsel we've already been in touch with, we'll go through those attorneys to set up any interviews; for everyone else (all of whom we've attempted to list in the attached spreadsheet), we can approach them directly. There are some individuals who we have some reason to believe may have been represented previously, and for those people we need to follow a protocol in the approach. That applies to: Ghsilaine Maxwell For those 11 individuals, if/when you approach any of them, please: 1) Identify the matter we are investigating, that is, conduct relating to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual contact with minor girls; and 2) Ask the individual if they currently are represented by counsel in connection with a matter related to Jeffrey Epstein, and then: a. If they say no, ask if they are willing to be interviewed, and if yes, proceed with an interview; b. If they say yes, ask for the attorney name and/or contact information (and/or serve a grand jury subpoena, if we've decided to issue one to that person), and end the interaction. For any individual not on the above list, we can proceed how you normally would with any other approach. The planned interview that prompted us to pause to go through the Hammad process wasl who I think it still at the top of our list to approach, so I think the sooner the better on that, and happy to chat about it anytime if that would be useful. And we can talk about other approaches to do in the next week or two