From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 00:25:03 +0000 Attachments: Ok sorry for the delay. Fo there is only the attachment; no notes were taken for the 302 authored by Yes, the 302 regarding= is just the short notes along with the invoice. There were no notes for M . I apologize for the confusion in labeling that attached. Ok I figured out the confusion. The because was present for the interview with reflected in the 302. interview is attached. is listed at the top From: Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 3:07 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes This is really helpful, and I think we're down to the last few. A couple follow-up questions / clarifications — Fo I don't think we received notes from 7/6/19 - the attachments included a copy of MID but not any writing. • possible there weren't other written notes — the 302, attached, is very short — but just let us know either way? Similarly, just want to confirm that the notes for are just the short contact info notes, with attorney info and a property invoice — both the notes and the 302 are attached for reference. I think right but just want to confirm. I also didn't see notes for S though let us know if Min a longer write-up in one of the files or if we otherwise missed it, also totally possible. And just a clarification, it looks like the other attached document is listed as interview," which I assume is ? It also has the name a' (?) at the top, which may be where that confusion comes from — I know you were looking into that. I think both those names just show up on that one doc. Also totally happy to chat via phone if easiest to run through these. Thanks again! EFTA00074680