In re Wild, 994 F.3d 1244 (2021) 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 2701 994 F.3d 1244 Editor's Note: Additions are indicated by Text and deletions by Text . United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. IN RE: Petitioner. No. 19-13843 (April 15, 2021) Synopsis Background: Alleged victim of child sexual abuse brought civil action against federal government, alleging that government violated Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by failing to confer with alleged victim before entering into non-prosecution agreement with alleged perpetrator. Alleged perpetrator intervened. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM, Kenneth A. Marra, Senior District Judge, 359 F.Supp.3d 1201, determined that government had violated CVRA, but after alleged perpetrator's death, alleged victim's requested remedies were denied and the action was dismissed, ' 41 I F.Supp.3d 1321. Alleged victim petitioned for writ of mandamus. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, r 955 F.3d 1196, denied the petition. (Holding:( On rehearing en banc, the Court of Appeals, Newsom, Circuit Judge, as a matter of apparent first impression, held that the CVRA did not create a private right of action authorizing crime victim to file stand-alone civil lawsuit to enforce CVRA rights. Petition denied. William H. Pryor, Chief Judge, filed concurring opinion, in which Newsom, Lagoa, Tjoflat, Circuit Judges, joined. Newsom, Circuit Judge, filed concurring opinion. Tjoflat, Circuit Judge, filed concurring opinion, in which William H. Pryor, Chief Judge, and Wilson, Newsom, and Lagoa, Circuit Judges, joined. Branch, Circuit Judge, filed dissenting opinion, in which Martin, Jill Pryor, and Hull, Circuit Judges, joined. Hull, Circuit Judge, filed dissenting opinion. Procedural Posture(s): On Appeal; Petition for Writ of Mandamus. West Headnotes (21) 111 Federal Courts I Questions of Law in General When the issues p