From: ' (USANYS)" <=l To: (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Times v BOP - Additional Production Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 20:15:13 +0000 K thanks From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 4:15 PM To:-, (USANYS) Subject: RE: Times v BOP - Additional Production Got it, but some of these records relate directly to the July 23 incident. I will identify pages that refer to that incident or otherwise to his suicidality. From: =, (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 4:13 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Times v BOP - Additional Production I think the position ultimately settled on is that medical records unrelated to things we care about (i.e., that aren't about suicidality or his ultimate suicide) are fine to produce. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 4:11 PM To: =, (USANYS)< > Subject: FW: Times v BOP - Additional Production Are we okay with disclosing Epstein's medical records? Some of the records are directly related to the July 23 incident, although others relate to other conditions. I had thought that all of his medical records were being withheld. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 10:48 AM To: =, (USANYS) (USANYS) >; • S (USANYS) < Subject: RE: Times v BOP - Additional Production (USANYS) c > < >; >; (USANYS) Yes, you should have seen all this before, but it now has BOP's has segmented redactions. As with prior rounds, I am circulating to the Crim teams and OIG before the production version actually goes out. This is mainly emails, but also includes at the start redacted medical records, not withheld in full under 7(A). Thanks. From: =, (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 10:39 AM To: (USANYS) < (USANYS) < (USANYS) ) >; >; (USANYS) < (USANYS) EFTA00072704