From: (USANYS)" To: SANYS (USANYS)" Cc: (USAN YS)" SANYS USANYS)" (USANYS) 1" Subject: RE: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghislaine Maxwell and Justin Rivera Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 22:54:45 +0000 Absolutely — we'll send around another update as soon as we know the substance of our response. From: (USANYS) Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 4:42 PM To: (USANYS) (USANYS) (USANYS) <Ma (USANYS) C ); >; (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) c > (USANYS) (USANYS) < ME>.; (USANYS) c ›;-(USANYS)1 Subject: RE: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghislaine Maxwell and Justin Rivera Thanks, Can you keep me posted on what we think will be the substance of the draft declaration when you know (that is, before we are submitting anything on 12/31)? And how much of this is attributable to differences between MCC and MDC, as well as specific differences in their housing situations? From: (USANYS) Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 4:35 PM To: (USANYS) .cM > (USANYS) (USANYS) c a'; (USANYS) c > ca; (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) (USANYS) (USANYS) >; (USANYS) c lb; (USANYS) 1 < > Subject: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghislaine Maxwell and Justin Rivera All: I wanted to bring to your attention a recent issue that's surfaced in United States v. Rivera et al., a sex trafficking case pending before Judge Engelmayer. As I'll describe in more detail below, Judge Engelmayer has asked us to submit a declaration from the BOP explaining why the discovery and counsel access accommodations provided to Ghislaine Maxwell (detained at the MDC outside the general population) cannot be extended to Justin Rivera (detained at the MCC in the general population). EFTA00031576