From: (USANYS) [Contractor]" To: ' )" Cc: " )" " (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Request for search in Maxwell case Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 17:18:20 +0000 Inline-Images: iniage001.jpg To confirm one more time you tagged all of the documents in the NYC folders (24348, 24349 and 24350) as when we add all of the numbers up it adds up to 5,283 documents. • The 347 documents tagged "Identified Responsive" in the NYCO24348 folder on the "US v. Epstein (SW Returns)" database; • The 39 documents tagged "Identified Responsive" in the NYCO24349 folder on the "US v. Epstein (SW Returns)" database; and • The 4,897 documents tagged "Identified Responsive" in the NYCO24350 folder on the "US v. Epstein (SW Returns)" database. The vendor had a quick question and I want to make sure we are referencing the same set of documents. Thank you. From: Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 11:51 AM To: (USANYS) [Contractor] Cc: ); (USANYS) Subject: RE: Request for search in Maxwell case Confirmed, thank you very much. From: (USANYS) [Contractor] Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 11:33 AM To: Cc: l C *; Subject: RE: Request for search in Maxwell case Per our conversation we will go ahead and produce this documents and add these documents to the large production are working on right now. I will let you know if there are any questions. Thank you. (USANYS) From: Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 10:43 AM To: (USANYS) [Contractor] < > Cc: >; (USANYS) Subject: RE: Request for search in Maxwell case I am confused by this email. Last week, I requested that particular documents from these folders be prepared for production (see attached correspondence). Would you please call me to discuss? Thanks, From: (USANYS) [Contractor] Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 10:40 AM To: Cc: lC ; (USANYS) Subject: RE: Request for search in Maxwell case EFTA00030524