From: To: (USANYS)" (ODAG)" Cc: ' (ODAG)" Subject: RE: Epstein Victim Impact Statements Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:27:45 +0000 Hi=, The FBI is aware of 1 or 2 victims who indicated they could not come on short notice, but does not recall which victims they were. There were other victims who decided not to come but cited other reasons, such as scheduling issues or aversion to press exposure. USAO is not aware of victims who raised scheduling issues. Of course, that doesn't mean they didn't have them, just that no one recalls anyone affirmatively raising them beyond the 1 or 2. I also now know that, including victims whose known counsel we contacted as opposed to directly, the number who were told about the hearing is at least 50, as opposed to 39. I am still working on whether this number of 50 includes all of the identified Florida victims. 17 is the total number of victims who either spoke or provided written submissions. From: (ODAG) Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 11:33 PM To: (USANYS) :' Cc: (ODAG) dc Subject: RE: Epstein Victim Impact Statements Thank you for this information. It is very helpful but we need a little more clarity. Can you confirm with the VW coordinators (USAO and FBI), prosecutors, and agents whether any victims complained about not being able to participate in the SDNY hearing? Can you also confirm whether the 39 contacted victims include all of the identified Florida victims? In addition to the 17 victims that spoke directly or through counsel, did any victims submit letters to the court in their absence? Petitioner's counsel has alleged that DOJ, specifically SDNY, possesses information that some of the Epstein victims were unable to attend the SDNY hearing because they did not have sufficient notice to travel to NY. They believe this information is material to the subjects currently being litigated in the 11th Circuit. We need to pin this information down so it can be addressed in the government's respons