From To: Cc: ' Subject: RE: State v. Jeffrey Epstein Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:25:14 +0000 Importance: Normal (USAFLS)" Given the non-disclosure agreement, aren't we left with telling the SAO that we have agreed to not disclose so it wouldn't be proper for us to now agree that unsealing is appropriate. Ultimately, it's the SAO's call because they will get the Florida Public Records Act request and they were not a signatory to the agreement. We should also notify defense counsel so that they can take whatever actions they believe are appropriate. Wait till others have had a chance to weigh in on this issue. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:50 AM To: (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: FW: State v. Jeffrey Epstein Will it never end? Barry Krisher sent the e-mail below to Rolando this morning. How would you like to handle this issue? Assistant U.S. Attome From: (USAFLS) Sent: W tuber 17, 2008 10:48 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: FW: State v. Jeffrey Epstein From: Barry Krischer plammummilmompap Sent: Wednesda September 17, 2008 10:46 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: FW: State v. Jeffrey Epstein Please advise how you would like us to proceed. The agreement referred to is the Federal Non-Prosecution agreement sealed in the file by the judge at the time of the Epstein plea. From: Lanna Belohlavek Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:21 PM To: Barry Krischer Subject: FW: State v. Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00014118