home

epstein-data
Research ▼
🔍 SearchFull-text document search 🤖 Ask AIAI research assistant 🔎 Evidence MapFBI serial resolution 📷 Reverse Image SearchCLIP + face across 614K images 🧑 Find Face BETASearch 29K faces by photo 💻 Run Your OwnDownload & search locally
Explore ▼
📚 Full Text Corpus1.39M docs, 2.77M pages 🌎 Global Heatmap145 countries mentioned 📈 Coverage MapWhat's here 🌌 AtlasSemantic map · 1.29M docs ⚖ Cases53 federal & state cases · per-case briefings 🎤 DepositionsTranscribed audio & video 💬 Hear from the SurvivorsSurvivors in their own words 📖 Cover to Cover-Up24-hour public reading, synced to the video ✉ Wolff–Epstein Emails2,009 messages · 2009–2019
📷 Images92K analyzed photographs 🔍 Multi-DB SearchSearch all databases individually 🗃 All Databases14 searchable databases
Entities Reports
News ▼
📰 NewsCoverage & reporting ⚖ Justice MonitorArrests, charges, lawsuits, firings
Source ▼
🏛 DOJ ProductionOfficial EFTA disclosures 📜 EFTA Law TextPublic Law 119-38 📁 Source Data (GitHub)Open source databases
🌐 Community ResourcesCurated external projects ✉ ContactGeneral · privacy · DMCA · press
❤️ Donate 🎧 Podcast

Research

🔍 Search Documents 🤖 Ask AI 🔎 Evidence Map 📷 Reverse Image Search 🧑 Find Face BETA 💻 Run Your Own Investigator

Explore

📚 Full Text Corpus 🌎 Global Heatmap 📈 Coverage Map 🌌 Atlas ⚖ Cases 🎤 Depositions 💬 Hear from the Survivors 📖 Cover to Cover-Up ✉ Wolff–Epstein Emails 📷 Images 🔍 Multi-DB Search 🗃 All Databases

Entities

👥 Entity Directory

Reports

Browse All Reports 📰 News ⚖ Justice Monitor

Source

🏛 DOJ Production 📜 EFTA Law 📁 Source Data (GitHub) 🌐 Community Resources ✉ Contact
🎧 Podcast & Newsletter ❤️ Donate Privacy Policy

DOJ-OGR-00006342

← Prev Next →
Loading document…

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 435 _ Filed 11/11/21 Page1ofi1 Uspc SDNY DOCUMENT | ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #; DATE FILED: 11/11/21 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, 20-CR-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Before the Court is the Defense’s motion to exclude the Government’s expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the standard in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). Dkt. No. 386. The Government filed a response brief, Dkt. No. 397, and Defendant filed a reply, Dkt. No. 398. The Court conducted a Daubert hearing on November 10, 2021, at which both parties examined Dr. Rocchio. Dkt. No. 431. The Court stated its oral opinion at that hearing that it would deny and grant in part Defendant’s motion, to be followed by this opinion. 1. Legal standard Federal Rule of Evidence 702 governs the admissibility of expert testimony. That rule states: A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; 1 DOJ-OGR- 00006342

Suggest a category
Misclassified? Pick a better fit.
Community Notes
▸ People Mentioned
▸ Interest Level
Routine Notable Significant
▸ Dates Mentioned
▸ Related Topics
▸ Places & Organizations
▸ Transcription Correction
▸ Research Notes 0
No notes yet.
Related documents
Source Data Investigation Reports DOJ EFTA CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Contact
Independent research project. Not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Justice, FBI, any government agency, or Anthropic. All analytical text on this site is AI-generated (Claude, Anthropic) and iteratively fact-checked against source documents, but may contain errors. Verify all claims against linked EFTA sources before citing.
Powered by Datasette  ·  ❤️ Buy me a coffee

You are leaving epstein-data.com

You are being redirected to an external website not operated by this project. We are not responsible for the content or privacy practices of external sites.

Powered by Datasette