[VISION] | PEOPLE: There are no visible people in the image. | TEXT: ``` Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 4 of 33 materials; (2) identify and evaluate the weight of any countervailing interests; and (3) determine whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption. The presumption of public access attaches to judicial documents; that is, those documents filed in accordance with a decided motion or papers that are relevant to the Court's exercise of its inherent supervisory powers. The documents at issue here were submitted in connection with discovery motions decided by Judge Sweet. The Court concludes that they are judicial documents to which the presumption of public access attaches. As with the documents that the Court ordered unsealed in July, however, the motions at issue today are, as noted, discovery motions. Accordingly, the presumption of public access is somewhat less weighty than for a dispositive motion. It is, nevertheless, important to the public's interest in monitoring federal courts' exercise of their Article III powers that the public review the documents. With this presumption of public access in mind, the Court turns to the countervailing interests at stake. The Court has considered the arguments advanced by the parties in their briefing. It has also considered the submission from intervenors Julie Brown and the Miami Herald Media Company. The Court has also received submissions from various Does, in addition to Does 1 and 2, who are under consideration now. ``` | OBJECTS: - A page from a legal document - Text on the page - Margins indicating the page number (Page 4 of 33) - A footer with contact information for SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | SETTING: - An indoor setting, likely an office or courtroom environment - The document is on a white background - There are no visible landmarks or geographic indicators | ACTIVITY: - The image shows a legal document discussing the presumption of public access to judicial